Op die site verschijnen uit alle windrichtingen vaak lange artikelen die historisch materiaal en/of ideeën-kritieken aandragen.
Soms wordt daarin ook verwezen naar Spinoza.
Zo schreef ene Mary Rizzo gisteren, 13 mei, een lang (25 A4-pagina's lang) artikel "Zahir Ebrahim – Palestine: The Struggle Forward," over het Zionisme en het joodse superioriteitsgevoel (van de uitverkorenheid). En zie hoe daarin Spinoza wordt opgevoerd:
"In other words, Zionism in the modern context is just another relative concept beyond the purview of absolute definitions of good and evil. It is whatever the reigning power wants it to be. If it says it's moral, then it's moral. In fact, it is seeded in respectable philosophy by Western standards. It is the philosophy of Spinoza and Nietzsche in modern times, and of Plato in ancient times. It is the philosophy of the ubermensch who by the very nature of being uber alles, are licensed to define their own standards of morality (and this is how the Straussian's read Plato's virtuous divine philosopher-king: since divine is dead, so philosopher is king, and therefore can create his own definition of virtue which is effectively what you see Leo Strauss writing above). And this is also precisely how Vladimir Jabotinsky defined the morality of Zionism in his seminal 1923 article The Iron Wall."